Exam grading

When evaluating an exam, I am always looking for a strong grasp of both the themes of the course and of individual texts. I really want to see your interpretation of the texts; I am looking for analysis (vs. summary) and for detailed evidence to back up your assertions.

A: Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the texts discussed; includes in-depth, detailed analysis of these texts; offers a clear and well-argued answer to the exam question; includes an introduction and conclusion that make connections (comparisons and contrasts) across texts, and are not mere restatements of my question.

B: Demonstrates a good grasp of the texts and the issues discussed in class; gives a clear answer to the exam question. Uses examples from individual texts to back up own ideas.

C: Displays a basic understanding of the texts but lacks detail or depth. May be more summary than analysis. May lack a clear, definitive answer to the exam question.

D-F: Essay lacks a clear understanding of the texts and the issues of the course. May distort elements of the texts, suggesting inattention or incomplete reading. Weak or incoherent response to the exam question.

Presentation dates

Here is the list of assigned presentation dates and partners based on your requests:


Section 02

Wednesday, 4/11

Kyle Pero and Jessica Foley
Seth Bied and Sarah James
Ryan Brown and Alyssa Gauthier

Friday, 4/13

Laura Durkee and Stephanie Gericke
Grace Gleason and Nicole Zullo

Monday 4/16

Kathryn Cahill and Colleen Sullivan
Jennifer Horton and Matt Barrington
Kaycie Tyll, Nicole Hoag, and Amanda Loitsch


Section 03

Wednesday, 4/11

Andrea Belanger and Shannon Mosher
Gregory Laruccia and Taysha Marcano
Erin Phinney Jennifer Crouse and Drew Countryman


Friday, 4/13

Nancy Gimondo and Ginger Fryer-Hollner
Lindsay Bombard and Greg Parent

Monday, 4/16

Sharae Jury and Kelly Cerneglia
Liz Hill and Kate Nesbitt
Roger Hartnett and Stacey Hill